Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±¸³» ¹æ»ç¼± Çʸ§ÀÇ Ç¥¸é¼Òµ¶È¿°ú¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

SURFACE DISINFECTION OF INTRAORAL FILMS

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1992³â 22±Ç 2È£ p.329 ~ 337
ÀÌÁø±¸, ¹éµ¿Çå,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÁø±¸ (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç
¹éµ¿Çå (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç

Abstract

º» ½ÇÇè¿¡¼­ÀÇ °á°ú¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ¿¹ºñ½ÇÇè¿¡¼­ 15ÃÊ, 30ÃÊ, 1ºÐ, 2ºÐ°£ ´ã°¡ ³õ¾ÒÀ»¶§, 1ºÐ À̻󿡼­´Â ¼¼±ÕÀÌ °ËÃâµÇÁö
¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. µû¶ó¼­, 1ºÐÀ» ÀûÁ¤½Ã°£À¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
2. 2% GlutaraldehydeÀÇ °æ¿ì 1ºÐ°£ Á¢ÃËÇßÀ»¶§ 24¸í(80%)¿¡¼­ ¼¼±ÕÀÌ ÀÜ·ùÇÏ¿´´Ù.
3. 3.5% Sodium hypochloriteÀÇ °æ¿ì 25¸í(83.3%)¿¡¼­ ¼¼±ÕÀÌ °ËÃâµÇÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.
4. 2% Glutaraldehyde¿Í 3.5% Sodium hypochlorite°£ÀÇ ¼Òµ¶È¿°úÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ´Â Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÏ¿´´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of the study was to determine whether Sodium hypochlorite and
Glutaraldehyde would be effective for the surface disinfection of contaminated
radiographic film pockets with saliva
The following results were as obtained
1. Proper times for surface disinfection of 2.0% Glutaraldehyde and 35% Sodium
hypochlorite were 60 seconds.
2. When films were immerged in 2% Glutaraldehyde solution for 1 minuter baterial
colonies were present in 24 cases(80%).
3. When films were immerged in 3.5% Sodium hypochlorite solution for 1 minute,
bacterial colony was absent in 25 cases(83.3%).
4. Differences of effectiveness on surface disinfection between 2% Glutaraldehyde and
3.5% Sodium hypochlorite were statistically significant.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸